Shrimps down under: Evolutionary relationships of subterranean crustaceans from Western Australia Decapoda: Atyidae: Stygiocaris. PLoS One 3 , e Drawn to the dark side: A molecular phylogeny of freshwater shrimps Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea: Atyidae reveals frequent cave invasions and challenges current taxonomic hypotheses.
Holthuis, L. An enumeration of the Crustacea Decapoda Natantia inhabiting subterranean waters. Vie Milieu 7 , 43—76 Sclater, J. The paleobathymetry of the Atlantic Ocean from the Jurassic to the present. Jones, E. Evolution of a major oceanographic pathway: the equatorial atlantic.
London, Spec. Publ 90 , — Reeves, C. The position of Madagascar within Gondwana and its movements during Gondwana dispersal. African Earth Sci 94 , 45—57 Palaeogeographic considerations for Mediterranean and Paratethys seaways Oligocene to Miocene. Xia, X. An index of substitution saturation and its application. Shen, H. Mitogenomic analysis of decapod crustacean phylogeny corroborates traditional views on their relationships. Lartillot, N. Rabosky, D. LASER: a maximum likelihood toolkit for detecting temporal shifts in diversification rates from molecular phylogenies.
Online 2 , —6 Etienne, R. Diversity-dependence brings molecular phylogenies closer to agreement with the fossil record. Automatic detection of key innovations, rate shifts, and diversity-dependence on phylogenetic trees. PLoS One 9 , e Assessing model sensitivity in ancestral area reconstruction using Lagrange: a case study using the Colchicaceae family. Two new species of atyid shrimps from subterranean waters of N. Australia Decapoda Natantia. Crustaceana 1 , 47—57 Leprieur, F.
Plate tectonics drive tropical reef biodiversity dynamics. Yu, Y. Meulenkamp, J. Tertiary palaeogeography and tectonostratigraphic evolution of the Northern and Southern Peri-Tethys platforms and the intermediate domains of the African—Eurasian convergent plate boundary zone. Winterer, E. Lukoschek, V.
Evaluating fossil calibrations for dating phylogenies in light of rates of molecular evolution: A comparison of three approaches. Hipsley, C. Beyond fossil calibrations: Realities of molecular clock practices in evolutionary biology. Goodbye Gondwana?
New Zealand biogeography, geology, and the problem of circularity. The impact of calibration and clock-model choice on molecular estimates of divergence times. Jurado-Rivera, J. The complete mitochondrial genome of the cave shrimp Typhlatya miravetensis Decapoda, Atyidae and its systematic position. Pons, J. Next-generation sequencing, phylogenetic signal and comparative mitogenomic analyses in Metacrangonyctidae Amphipoda: Crustacea.
BMC Genomics 15 , Wyman, S. Bioinformatics 20 , —5 Bernt, M. MITOS: improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mir, A. A new balance index for phylogenetic trees. Lanfear, R. PartitionFinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses.
Nguyen, L. Yang, Z. Models of amino acid substitution and applications to mitochondrial protein evolution. Bouckaert, R.
PLoS Comput. Raftery, A. In Bayesian Statistics ed. Bernardo J. Pybus, O. Testing macro-evolutionary models using incomplete molecular phylogenies. Popescu, A. Bioinformatics 28 , —7 BAMMtools: an R package for the analysis of evolutionary dynamics on phylogenetic trees.
Methods Ecol. Ree, R. Download references. We also thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their helpful suggestions. CP, , Mexico. Water Planning Ecology, Queensland Dept. You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Reprints and Permissions. Phylogenetic evidence that both ancient vicariance and dispersal have contributed to the biogeographic patterns of anchialine cave shrimps. Sci Rep 7, Download citation. Received : 06 December Accepted : 25 April Published : 06 June Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:.
Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative. Scientific Reports BMC Genomics Both biogeographical processes result in the isolation of a population by a geographic barrier, followed by differentiation of a new taxon by allopatric geographically separated speciation. However, the barrier in the dispersal explanation is older than the geographic disjunction, whereas the appearance of the geographic barrier is responsible for the geographic disjunction in the vicariance explanation, so it cannot be older than the resulting speciation event.
Although vicariance and dispersal are not mutually exclusive processes—the opening of the Gibraltar Strait between North Africa and Iberia in the Pliocene was simultaneously a vicariance event for terrestrial organisms and a dispersal event for marine organisms—the history of biogeography as an evolutionary science could be considered until recently as the history of a debate between dispersal and vicariance explanations.
To learn more about subscribing to AccessScience, or to request a no-risk trial of this award-winning scientific reference for your institution, fill in your information and a member of our Sales Team will contact you as soon as possible. Recognized as an award-winning gateway to scientific knowledge, AccessScience is an amazing online resource that contains high-quality reference material written specifically for students. Problem : A farmer plants two crops of the same plant three weeks apart.
The first crop each crop flowers for about a week, approximately four weeks after planting. What type of reproductive isolation would you expect to find between these two populations? Problem : The male of a given species of frog uses distinctive calls to attract mates. Two populations of these frogs coexist in a single pond but never interbreed because their mating calls are different.
In contrast, vicariance occurs due to appearance of a new geographical barrier that separates the population. Thus, this is the key difference between dispersal and vicariance. Dispersal and vicariance are two alternative biogeographic processes that explain disjunct distribution of organisms. Both processes cause the isolation of a population by a geographic barrier. In dispersal, the separation of a population occurs when a part of population migrates across a preexisting geographical barrier.
In vicariance, the separation occurs due to the appearance of a new geographical barrier that divides the population. Thus, migration is responsible for dispersal while appearance of a new geographical barrier is responsible for vicariance.
This is the summary of difference between dispersal and vicariance.
0コメント